Possible healthcare tax district

Possible healthcare tax district

Attention: open in a new window. PDFPrintE-mail

Property taxes an option to fund care for indigent, needy residents

In 2004, Travis County voters approved the creation of a taxing authority known as a hospital district to provide health services to uninsured and underinsured residents.

By a quirk of semantics, it was later named the Travis County Healthcare District.

At the time, the creation of a hospital district that would serve multiple Central Texas counties was considered, but the single-county strategy prevailed. Some involved in that effort now work in Williamson County healthcare settings, and the idea of a hospital district here is being informally discussed.

What is a hospital district?

As defined by Chapter 281 of the Texas Health and Safety Code, a hospital district is an entity with the ability to levy property taxes to establish a hospital or hospital system to furnish medical aid and hospital care to indigent and needy persons residing in the district. Quote from Mark Hazelwood

The law obligates such facilities to serve people at or below 21 percent of the Federal Poverty Level, a ridiculously low standard, said Christie Garbe, chief communications officer of the Travis County Healthcare District. TCHD chooses to provide varying levels of services to residents making up to 200 percent of the poverty level.

The most recent United States Census Bureau poverty statistics for Williamson County indicate that 19,663 residents — 6 percent of the county — were living in poverty in 2005. For that year, the poverty threshold for a family of two parents and two children was $21,027. For a single person younger than 65, the level was $13,884, and for a single person older than 65, the level was $12,533.

Williamson County fares better than the state average of residents living in poverty, which was 17.5 percent in 2005, according to the census bureau, and better than Travis County’s 15.5 percent.

Too wealthy to worry

Williamson County’s relative affluence combined with the area’s strong conservative foundation would make creating a hospital district here a hard sell, said Mark Hazelwood, president and CEO of Seton Medical Center Williamson.

He was involved in advocacy and communication efforts for Travis County’s hospital district before voters approved it.

“Up here, one of the big challenges we have is for people to appreciate that this is an issue we need to start working on,” Hazelwood said. “There’s an assumption that all these new hospitals will take care of the problem, and, in fact, they probably will help alleviate the problem in the near term, but in the long term, this is going to be a real issue.”

Ernie Bovio, CEO of Scott & White University Medical Campus Hospital, said that while a hospital district could be part of the solution to what is going to become a growing concern for the county, the current demographic is such that the concept is not on the public’s radar.

Bootstraps, not taxes

If it was on the radar, Hazelwood said, residents would likely not take to the idea of creating another taxing authority.

“It’s going to get them into discussions of, ‘Why should I have to pay for somebody else?’ although there’s a lot of people up here who are very generous, and this is a very faith-oriented area. This area is viewed as so fiscally conservative, but faith-based people give [charitably], on average, more than non-faith-based people.”

Another thing that may sour voters on paying a tax to fund indigent health care is that in Texas, 80 percent of uninsured people have jobs, and of that number, 80 percent have insurance available to them that they choose not to take, Hazelwood said.

“That doesn’t square very well with people who think philosophically that you need to be more self-reliant and step up and be more accountable for taking care of yourself.”

In 2005, the Texas Data Center estimated 59,020 — 17.7 percent — of Williamson County residents were uninsured.

The bottom line, Bovio said, is that taxpayers are already funding indigent care through their insurance premiums.

“Would [a hospital district] benefit the hospital? Yes, ultimately I think it would help close the gap that exists. Specialty care and hospital care is not funded through federally qualified health centers,” Bovio said.

What are FQHCs?

In 2004, the Lone Star Circle of Care applied for and was granted federally qualified health center, or FQHC, status to serve Williamson County, which at the time was designated as a medically underserved area. Once granted, an organization retains its status as an FQHC regardless of changes in the number of healthcare providers.

LSCC provides primary care as well as dental, psychiatric and women’s services through its clinics, which are located on the eastern side of the county. Through its designation as an FQHC, Lone Star receives a higher reimbursement rate from the government for the Medicare and Medicaid patients it serves than a hospital or physician lacking the designation. In return, an FQHC agrees to focus its efforts on serving the under- and uninsured population.

Pete Perialas, who was involved in the marketing of Travis County’s hospital district, is now CEO of Lone Star. He said his organization would be an ideal implementer of a Williamson County hospital district.

“We would be the core provider of primary care services. We would not just have 9-to-5 clinics. We would have clinics open seven days a week for 12 to 14 hours a day so that people who needed [basic care] would have some place to go other than the emergency room.”

Competitive care?

With five hospitals now located in Williamson County, it is possible those healthcare providers might see a hospital district as extra competition, Perialas said.

“Though it’s not optimal to have someone in your ER who just needs [basic care], hospitals have sort of evolved this dysfunctional economic model that accounts for that. They will need to know that a hospital district is permanent before they will let go of that model. The only thing worse than having someone come into the ER that only needs hydration is having nobody come in.”

The reality of the hospital industry, said Alfred Knight, president and CEO of Scott & White Hospital System, is that it takes between three and five years for a new hospital to become profitable. Three of the five hospitals in Williamson County are less than three years old.

“The bottom line,” said Dr. David Klein, CEO of Cedar Park Regional Medical Center, “is that we would be for anything that improves the health of the community.”

Williamson County and Cities Health District

Williamson County has an existing health district. Though the name is similar to Travis County’s Healthcare District, the function is different. First organized as the Williamson County Health Department in 1943, it was reformatted into its current state as a health district in 1989.

A health district is a government entity funded by member cities, Texas Department of State Health Services contracts, client fees, Medicaid and Children’s Health Insurance Program reimbursement, grants, contracts and contributions.

Member cities include Cedar Park, Georgetown, Round Rock and Taylor. Though Leander is not a member city, it does contribute some funds.

The focus of a health district is on the health of the community at large more than on individuals, said Dr. James Morgan, director of Williamson County’s health district.

“WCCHD focuses on population health, and it is our goal to support community providers in being able to meet the demand for personal medical care services. We serve in a very limited ‘safety net’ role in providing health care for individuals,” Morgan said.

In the past, health districts played a larger healthcare safety net role, but now those services are provided by federally qualified health centers and hospital districts.

“We try not to duplicate any services in the community that have a funding source,” Morgan said. “The main area where you could look at and say there is duplication is immunizations.”

WCCHD continues to provide immunizations because some physicians are wary of stocking expensive vaccines, choosing instead to refer patients to the health district.

“Our part in the ‘big picture’ is to assist the county in providing support and help to people in need of medical care services, to monitor the collective health of the communities we serve, to provide information on health to communities and individuals and to assist the county and cities in assuring conditions under which people can live safe and healthy lives,” Morgan said.

In addition to health services, the WCCHD provides:

  • Daycare center and foster care inspections
  • Food handler sanitation training, inspections
  • Restaurant rating search tool
  • Sanitation complaint investigation
  • Breastfeeding support
  • Cooking classes
  • Gardening
  • Women, Infants and Children program
  • Community outreach and education
  • Flood plain management
  • On-site sewage facility regulations and inspections
  • Subdivision review
  • Disaster preparedness

For more information about the WCCHD, visit www.wcchd.org

 

Q&A with David Klein

Williamson County and Cities Health DistrictMaria Daravi at the WCCHD Health Education and Social Services Division helps uninsured clients find doctors.

Williamson County has an existing health district and though the name is similar to Travis County’s Healthcare District, the function is different. First organized as the Williamson County Health Department in 1943, the WCCHD was reformatted into its current state as a health district in 1989.

A health district is a government entity funded by member cities, Texas Department of State Health Services contracts, client fees, Medicaid and Children’s Health Insurance Program reimbursement, grants, contracts and contributions.

WCCHD Health Education and Social Services, 211 Commerce Blvd., Ste. 114, Round Rock • (800) 890-6296

Map showing location of WCCHD Health Education and Social Services

For more information about the WCCHD, visit www.wcchd.org

feed4 Comments
Nolan G. Metz
August 01, 2008
Votes: +2

No more taxes. Seton didn't enter the Williamson County health market to lose money. They must have seen a potential to make money. Now they want access to a bottomless pit of taxpayer dollars. I am tired of paying other peoples bills. Government has an attitude that they will just take some more from the taxpayer when they run short. I say enough is enough. It is time to start cutting programs instead of tapping the taxpayer well some more.

report abuse
vote down
vote up
Kirk Zippe, Pflugerville
August 03, 2008
Votes: +0

The article leaves me with questions:

•Why are 80% of the uninsured in Texas choosing not to take coverage available to them at their jobs and how does that number breakdown for Travis and WILCO counties?
oWhat percent is full-time students?
oWhat percent of the 80% uninsured in Texas choosing not to take health benefits at work meet poverty level guidelines?
oWhat percent of the 80% give cost as the reason for not choosing to take coverage at work?
•TCHD chooses to provide services to people making 200% of the poverty level.
oWhy and how does this affect the number of people who qualify for benefits?
Poverty Thresholds:
•Family of Four is $21,027. 200% = $42,054.
•Single is $12,533. 200% is $25,066.
oIs there federal duplication of coverage at 65> ?
oDo these guidelines affect employer decisions in regard to offering coverage?
•In 2005, WILCO had 17.7% uninsured with a 6% poverty level( or within 200%).
oWhat percent of uninsured did Travis have with 15.5% poverty level?
oWhat percentage are full-time students?
oHow does the state percentages compare to Travis and WILCO?
•For those in the category of choosing not to pay for the benefits at work because they can get care through the Hospital District, wouldn’t having a hospital district in Travis and not in surrounding counties provide an incentive to live in Travis? Why would you not want to live in Travis and receive free healthcare instead of WILCO?
oWhat measures are in place to prevent this from happening now?
•How would Hospital Districts be affected by a National Healthcare System?

report abuse
vote down
vote up
Chris Terry
August 05, 2008
Votes: +3

NO MORE TAXES!! The American people are under a tax siege by the government at every level and we're fed up with it. Also, the idea of trying to portray people that are opposed to yet another taxing entity as "too wealthy to worry" not only is extremely offensive to those of us that generously give (keyword "given", not "taken") but also highlights the typical tax and spend attitude of bureaucrats that thrive as a result of these type of programs (how many administrators and managers get funded as part of these programs?)

Not only do 80 percent of uninsured people have jobs, and of that number, 80 percent have insurance available to them that they choose not to take, there are also a large number of illegal aliens in that number (as chronicled in the Travis county debate) which I find an outrage.

I will personally organize and do everything I possibly can to defeat this effort, enough is enough!

report abuse
vote down
vote up
Holly Hansen
August 24, 2008
Votes: +0

This is Socialized Medicine smuggled in through the back door. As demonstrated by your 80% stat, too many Americans are falling into the entitlement mentality. Instead of satellite televison, IPhones, and $5 cups of coffee, those with properly aligned priorities should spend their own earnings on their own healthcare.

report abuse
vote down
vote up

Write comment
 
  smaller | bigger
 

security image
Write the displayed characters


busy